“Oh, you let them build a war model?” another adult is scanning our products from our Innovation Day. “I don’t think I would let them do that…” and so begins my train of thought. Did I do something wrong by allowing Jack to build a model of D-Day? Should I have steered him toward something kinder, more 4th gradeish, should learning about war be a one time occurrence?
Category: being a teacher
Our Favorite Memories
The Sheer Genius of SmartBoards
![]() |
| Image taken from here |
I am not a believer in SmartBoards, there I said it. Sure, they are a nice tech tool to have but honestly, for that amount of money, I could think of about a thousand other things I would rather have in my classroom. In fact, Bill Ferriter at the Tempered Radical agrees with me, which partly prompted this post. And yet, I have to applaud what the makers of SmartBoards have done to our school districts. Think about it, a smart board. So if you have it then you must be smart for making the investment and if you don’t, well, then you are not.
Sometimes it is all in a name. After all, that is why companies spend money trying to come up with the best marketing they can. So when someone came up with the name SmartBoard you know high fives went around the room. How about the Interactive Whiteboard? Teachers love to speak of how interactive their SmartBoards really are. And where does that notion come from? Their name. I do nto for one minute believe that soemone went up to that board and thought indepedently of how interactive they are for students, maybe for the teacher, but not for others. It really should just be called a touch and response board but that just doesn’t seem to have the same kind of connotation. So when you call something interactive well, then, think of how much easier you can sell it.
So really who is the board interactive for? The teacher who gets to touch it as the lesson moves on or the selected student who gets to come up and move a word around. Ooooh, now that is engaged learning. I don’t dismiss interactive whiteboards as classroom tools altogether but I do dismiss the notion that they are the ticket to reform our classrooms, to re-engage our learners, and teach our children. Instead they lead themselves to more “sage on the stage” type of teaching where the teacher is in control of all of the learning and the students just get to participate. That is not what school should be. So laud your interactive whiteboards as much as you want, but keep in mind just how they were sold to you. I think it is time we see them for they really are; tools, not solutions, not magic pills, just another tool and one that comes with a steep pricetag and a much too deep learning curve. This should not be the future of our classrooms.
Some Questions on Labels
Those struggling learners, the reluctant readers, the underachievers. All labels heard in schools on a daily basis. The tired ones, the creative types, the giften, the talented, the fidgeters, the lazy students. We label and label in order to define them all, to fit them all into a box under the pretense of being better teachers, of making our jobs easier, more manageable, more suited for differentiation. After all, if we don’t label then how will we know who needs which services? If we do not label then who will we teach at what time? How will class lists be made up to ensure balanced needs? We may not be tracking our atudents openly but the labels keep on coming.
I often ponder labels and what effect they have had on my own life. Some teachers labeled me gifted, I was not, only gifted through circumstance. Others labeled me underachieving, where rather it was in response to the teaching method. I was labeled opinionated in history, that one stuck, outspoken in English, talentless in math, and relentless in my pursuit of academic excellence in college. Labels shaped my education whether I agreed with them or not, yet how often were they shared with me? How often was I aware of what category I was placed in? And worse, how often when I was aware did it become my definition?
Some will inevitably argue that if we do not label our students whether through tests or grades then how will we rank them? How will we teach them best? If we don’t know who our strugglers are then how will we reach them? I don’t know. But what happens when those labels become all we see? What happens when the labels end up defining the student rather than the student defining the label. What happens when one teacher’s comment becomes the mold we force the student into? Can we label our students without actually harming them and impeding their learning? Can we genuinely categorize students as struggling when they are perhaps just learning at a different pace?
I hope someone has the answer.
We End the Year
We end the year the way it began; eager, anxious, pondering what comes next? We end the year the way it began; wondering where to now, what challenges shall we undertake, who will be our friends? A year has passed, the goals been met – or have they – and constantly we ask ourselves; now what, now what, now what?
So I Survived My First EdCamp
What followed was a day of stimulating conversation, a lot of laughs, and a lot of connections. So what were my biggest take away’s? Well, the connections were incredible. Every day I pour my heart on on this blog and on Twitter, so to have people come up and tell me that they know who I am and like what I write, really was mind-blowing for this small town girl. Also, to get a chance to sit down and speak to some of the educators I learn from myself was incredible. The different experiences, stories, and perspectives really offered me a jolt of knowledge.
I also learned a lot about myself. I can speak in front of peers that I respect even if I have not met them before. I can also voice my opinion without being too bullheaded about it. I learned that somehow I am making meaningful connections with people that I have met through Twitter. It was also amazing to hear other non-present people’s names being brought into the conversation and others recognizing the names. It truly showed just how connected one can be on Twitter.
And finally, the idea of regular people setting the agenda, offering choice, and impromptu conversations, really played into my belief that we must offer our students choice. I chose to leave one session because I was not adding anything useful to it, instead we created a smack down which was incredible. I chose to be part of a session on grading, because it is something I am passionate about. I chose what I wanted to learn, how I wanted to be challenged, so my stake was personal and I was more engaged. That is what we should offer our students as well.
So did I get inspired, sure, but mostly I had my spirit renewed. There are passionate educators out there who have no problem with spending an entire Saturday discussing how we best can reach students. That is incredible. There are people out there who have no qualms of telling you exactly how they feel even if they disagree with you, but also this sense of not being alone. I often reach to Twitter to be inspired, but I often walk away with new energy and new passion. EdCampChicago did that for me as well. I am sad that I will not be at ISTE this year, but hopeful that next year will be my year for truly making the face-to-face connections. I will be there in spirit.

